Continuing on the blog series for IFRS, in this blog we discuss the things in bold below
- History of IFRS and why/how it came into existence
- Basic principles of IFRS
- IFRS roadmap by different countries
- List of IFRS
- IFRS deep dive on standards
- Significant differences between IFRS and country GAAP e.g. US GAAP
- How IFRS is enabled in SAP products
- How should your company plan for IFRS adoption
- What global opportunities exists for IFRS consultants…..and more
Many countries have adapted IFRS across the globe. They have clearly indicated a roadmap whereby companies in their respective countries have to adapt IFRS. The below graphic represents a rough spread in terms of which countries have adopted, are moving towards adoption"
Information, updated as on August 2008, for 162 countries (or jurisdictions):
- IFRSs required for all — 85 countries
- IFRSs permitted — 24 countries
- IFRSs required for some — 4 countries
- IFRSs not permitted — 34 countries
- No stock exchange — 15 countries
So you can note that about 113 countries have signed up mandatorily or optionally for IFRS.
Let us examine some of the countries perspective.
EU countries were the first to adapt IFRS and there was a mandate to get all of the listed companies to follow IFRS by 2005.
US has taken significant steps to move towards IFRS. In late August 2008, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced its proposal on the roadmap that could lead to requiring public companies to issue their financial statements under IFRS in 2014. However the final determination of the adoption would be made by 2011. For this SEC has identified few milestones that would enable it to take a decision on transition of US GAAP to IFRS
- Continued improvement in IFRS — in line with the objective of continuous improvement as part of the convergence between U.S. GAAP and IFRS.
- Change in the IASB organization — to reinforce its accountability and to stabilize its funding. Earlier this year, the Trustees of IASB proposed to set up an oversight committee, which would include the SEC, the European Commission and the U.K.’s Financial Services Authority.
- Develop an IFRS eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL) taxonomy — mirroring the existing U.S. GAAP XBRL taxonomy. The International Accounting Standards Committee (IASC) Foundation announced the publication of the IFRS taxonomy guide on August 28, 2008.
- Training and education — of users, such as preparers, auditors or investors in the U.S.
Large companies that meet the following criteria would qualify for this early adoption:
- The company must be in the top-20 of its industry;
- IFRS must be the most used accounting standard in the industry, which does not mean that more than 50 percent of companies are under IFRS; and
- The company must receive a no objection letter from the SEC.
While the SEC has singled out about 110 companies that would meet this criterion, it expects to exclude large companies with activities in which U.S. groups are dominant from early adoption.
While the SEC has made no set decision, both companies and CPAs should be prepared for what’s to come. The roadmap presents a clear path to the transition to IFRS, but the SEC has decided to stay short on the decision, which has been postponed until 2011, and to leave open the discussion.
However, a company’s strategy to wait until 2011 for the SEC decision on the transition towards IFRS may backfire since once the decision is made, there would be almost no time to move properly to IFRS.
Experience shows that the transition to IFRS will impact not only company’s accounting department, but the entire company because:
- Business decisions will be impacted by the accounting standards. For example, 1) in general, while research and development costs are expensed under U.S. GAAP, they can be capitalized under IFRS; and 2) hedge accounting is different under both standards and will require a change in processes in order to maintain a similar result;
- Tax planning has to be revalued; and
- Internal control and processes have to be reviewed.
· The reporting, including budgeting, will have to be revisited along with systems in order to maintain an effective management of the performance.
China decided that Chinese companies would adopt IFRS in 2006. This move was taken to boost foreign investment into china. However state run enterprises would be execmpted from the ‘related-party’ disclosures.
Japan agreed to move to IFRS by 2011. Japan’s claim was that its existing GAAP was similar to IFRS and saw no issue in Japenese companies moving to IFRS in that timeframe.
South Korea indicated that it will adopt IFRS by 2011. India has also indicated it would adopt IFRS by 2011.
As seen above many of the leading developing countries have either adopted or specified a clear roadmap for adoption of IFRS. This presents a huge opportunity for the world to become unified in terms of financial governance and reporting.4. List of IFRS
IFRS is a combination of IFRS and IAS standards and is very exhaustive. The below list provides what each one is and what they cover:
IFRS also includes the International Accounting Standards that specify accounting guidelines to be followed in different areas. There are about 41 International Accounting Standards
IAS 14 – Segment Reporting
You can see that some missing numbers in the above list , these are standards that have been combined into others or removed, and therefore they no longer exist.
Understanding the above standards in detail would be valuable for Business Process Expert consultants who want to implement IFRS.
We would continue further on this blog series as we move into more technical aspects of IFRS and logically move towards how SAP’s solutions are suited to enable IFRS.
Also refer Part I of the blog series.